Man and Woman and Baby Clipart Single Celled Vs Multicellular Organism
A multicellular organism is an organism that consists of more than than one cell, in dissimilarity to a unicellular organism.[one]
All species of animals, land plants and most fungi are multicellular, as are many algae, whereas a few organisms are partially uni- and partially multicellular, similar slime molds and social amoebae such equally the genus Dictyostelium.[2] [3]
Multicellular organisms arise in diverse ways, for example by cell sectionalisation or by aggregation of many single cells.[4] [three] Colonial organisms are the result of many identical individuals joining together to form a colony. Even so, it can ofttimes be difficult to divide colonial protists from truthful multicellular organisms, because the two concepts are non distinct; colonial protists have been dubbed "pluricellular" rather than "multicellular".[five] [six] There are also multinucleate though technically unicellular organisms that are macroscopic, such as the xenophyophorea that can reach twenty cm.
Evolutionary history [edit]
Occurrence [edit]
Multicellularity has evolved independently at least 25 times in eukaryotes,[7] [8] and also in some prokaryotes, similar blue-green alga, myxobacteria, actinomycetes, Magnetoglobus multicellularis or Methanosarcina.[iii] All the same, complex multicellular organisms evolved simply in six eukaryotic groups: animals, symbiomycotan fungi, chocolate-brown algae, ruby algae, green algae, and land plants.[9] It evolved repeatedly for Chloroplastida (green algae and state plants), in one case for animals, once for brown algae, three times in the fungi (chytrids, ascomycetes and basidiomycetes)[x] and perhaps several times for slime molds and cerise algae.[11] The first evidence of multicellular organization, which is when unicellular organisms coordinate behaviors and may be an evolutionary precursor to true multicellularity, is from cyanobacteria-like organisms that lived iii–3.5 billion years ago.[7] To reproduce, true multicellular organisms must solve the problem of regenerating a whole organism from germ cells (i.eastward., sperm and egg cells), an event that is studied in evolutionary developmental biological science. Animals have evolved a considerable diversity of prison cell types in a multicellular body (100–150 different cell types), compared with x–20 in plants and fungi.[12]
Loss of multicellularity [edit]
Loss of multicellularity occurred in some groups.[xiii] Fungi are predominantly multicellular, though early diverging lineages are largely unicellular (e.g., Microsporidia) and in that location accept been numerous reversions to unicellularity across fungi (e.g., Saccharomycotina, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts).[14] [15] Information technology may also take occurred in some red algae (e.thousand., Porphyridium), merely it is possible that they are primitively unicellular.[16] Loss of multicellularity is also considered probable in some light-green algae (east.yard., Chlorella vulgaris and some Ulvophyceae).[17] [18] In other groups, mostly parasites, a reduction of multicellularity occurred, in number or types of cells (e.g., the myxozoans, multicellular organisms, before thought to be unicellular, are probably extremely reduced cnidarians).[19]
Cancer [edit]
Multicellular organisms, particularly long-living animals, face the challenge of cancer, which occurs when cells fail to regulate their growth within the normal plan of development. Changes in tissue morphology can be observed during this procedure. Cancer in animals (metazoans) has oftentimes been described as a loss of multicellularity.[xx] At that place is a discussion about the possibility of beingness of cancer in other multicellular organisms[21] [22] or even in protozoa.[23] For instance, plant galls have been characterized as tumors,[24] but some authors debate that plants exercise not develop cancer.[25]
Separation of somatic and germ cells [edit]
In some multicellular groups, which are called Weismannists, a separation between a sterile somatic cell line and a germ cell line evolved. However, Weismannist development is relatively rare (e.g., vertebrates, arthropods, Volvox), as a smashing part of species have the chapters for somatic embryogenesis (e.yard., country plants, nearly algae, many invertebrates).[26] [27]
Origin hypotheses [edit]
Ane hypothesis for the origin of multicellularity is that a group of function-specific cells aggregated into a slug-like mass called a grex, which moved as a multicellular unit. This is essentially what slime molds do. Another hypothesis is that a primitive cell underwent nucleus division, thereby condign a coenocyte. A membrane would and so course around each nucleus (and the cellular space and organelles occupied in the infinite), thereby resulting in a group of connected cells in 1 organism (this mechanism is observable in Drosophila). A third hypothesis is that as a unicellular organism divided, the girl cells failed to separate, resulting in a conglomeration of identical cells in one organism, which could later develop specialized tissues. This is what plant and animal embryos do too as colonial choanoflagellates.[28] [29]
Because the get-go multicellular organisms were elementary, soft organisms defective bone, crush or other difficult torso parts, they are not well preserved in the fossil tape.[30] Ane exception may be the demosponge, which may accept left a chemical signature in ancient rocks. The earliest fossils of multicellular organisms include the contested Grypania spiralis and the fossils of the black shales of the Palaeoproterozoic Francevillian Group Fossil B Germination in Gabonese republic (Gabonionta).[31] The Doushantuo Germination has yielded 600 million year former microfossils with show of multicellular traits.[32]
Until recently, phylogenetic reconstruction has been through anatomical (particularly embryological) similarities. This is inexact, equally living multicellular organisms such as animals and plants are more than than 500 million years removed from their single-cell ancestors. Such a passage of time allows both divergent and convergent evolution fourth dimension to mimic similarities and accumulate differences between groups of modern and extinct ancestral species. Modern phylogenetics uses sophisticated techniques such as alloenzymes, satellite DNA and other molecular markers to describe traits that are shared between distantly related lineages.[ citation needed ]
The evolution of multicellularity could have occurred in a number of different ways, some of which are described below:
The symbiotic theory [edit]
This theory suggests that the outset multicellular organisms occurred from symbiosis (cooperation) of different species of single-cell organisms, each with different roles. Over time these organisms would become so dependent on each other they would non be able to survive independently, eventually leading to the incorporation of their genomes into i multicellular organism.[33] Each respective organism would become a dissever lineage of differentiated cells inside the newly created species.
This kind of severely co-dependent symbiosis tin can be seen oftentimes, such as in the human relationship between clown fish and Riterri sea anemones. In these cases, it is extremely doubtful whether either species would survive very long if the other became extinct. However, the trouble with this theory is that it is still not known how each organism'south Deoxyribonucleic acid could be incorporated into one single genome to constitute them equally a single species. Although such symbiosis is theorized to have occurred (e.thou., mitochondria and chloroplasts in animal and establish cells—endosymbiosis), it has happened only extremely rarely and, even then, the genomes of the endosymbionts have retained an element of distinction, separately replicating their Deoxyribonucleic acid during mitosis of the host species. For instance, the two or three symbiotic organisms forming the composite lichen, although dependent on each other for survival, have to separately reproduce and then re-course to create i individual organism once again.
The cellularization (syncytial) theory [edit]
This theory states that a single unicellular organism, with multiple nuclei, could accept adult internal membrane partitions around each of its nuclei.[34] Many protists such as the ciliates or slime molds tin take several nuclei, lending support to this hypothesis. However, the unproblematic presence of multiple nuclei is not enough to support the theory. Multiple nuclei of ciliates are different and have articulate differentiated functions. The macronucleus serves the organism's needs, whereas the micronucleus is used for sexual reproduction with exchange of genetic fabric. Slime molds syncitia grade from individual amoeboid cells, similar syncitial tissues of some multicellular organisms, non the other way circular. To be accounted valid, this theory needs a demonstrable example and machinery of generation of a multicellular organism from a pre-existing syncytium.
The colonial theory [edit]
The colonial theory of Haeckel, 1874, proposes that the symbiosis of many organisms of the same species (unlike the symbiotic theory, which suggests the symbiosis of different species) led to a multicellular organism. At to the lowest degree some, information technology is presumed land-evolved, multicellularity occurs by cells separating and so rejoining (eastward.m., cellular slime molds) whereas for the majority of multicellular types (those that evolved within aquatic environments), multicellularity occurs equally a consequence of cells failing to split up following division.[35] The mechanism of this latter colony germination tin can be every bit elementary as incomplete cytokinesis, though multicellularity is also typically considered to involve cellular differentiation.[36]
The advantage of the Colonial Theory hypothesis is that information technology has been seen to occur independently in 16 dissimilar protoctistan phyla. For instance, during food shortages the amoeba Dictyostelium groups together in a colony that moves as ane to a new location. Some of these amoeba so slightly differentiate from each other. Other examples of colonial organisation in protista are Volvocaceae, such as Eudorina and Volvox, the latter of which consists of upwardly to 500–50,000 cells (depending on the species), only a fraction of which reproduce.[37] For example, in 1 species 25–35 cells reproduce, 8 asexually and around 15–25 sexually. All the same, it tin can often exist hard to separate colonial protists from true multicellular organisms, every bit the two concepts are not distinct; colonial protists have been dubbed "pluricellular" rather than "multicellular".[5]
The synzoospore theory [edit]
Some authors suggest that the origin of multicellularity, at least in Metazoa, occurred due to a transition from temporal to spatial prison cell differentiation, rather than through a gradual development of prison cell differentiation, equally affirmed in Haeckel's gastraea theory.[38]
GK-PID [edit]
About 800 million years agone,[39] a minor genetic change in a single molecule chosen guanylate kinase protein-interaction domain (GK-PID) may have allowed organisms to go from a single cell organism to i of many cells.[forty]
The role of viruses [edit]
Genes borrowed from viruses and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) have recently been identified as playing a crucial part in the differentiation of multicellular tissues and organs and even in sexual reproduction, in the fusion of egg cell and sperm.[41] [42] Such fused cells are also involved in metazoan membranes such every bit those that foreclose chemicals crossing the placenta and the brain torso separation.[41] Two viral components have been identified. The first is syncytin, which came from a virus.[43] The second identified in 2007 is chosen EFF1, which helps course the pare of Caenorhabditis elegans, function of a whole family of FF proteins. Felix Rey, of the Pasteur Institute in Paris has constructed the 3D structure of the EFF1 protein[44] and shown it does the work of linking one jail cell to another, in viral infections. The fact that all known cell fusion molecules are viral in origin suggests that they have been vitally important to the inter-cellular advice systems that enabled multicellularity. Without the ability of cellular fusion, colonies could have formed, just anything even every bit complex every bit a sponge would not have been possible.[45]
Oxygen availability hypothesis [edit]
This theory suggests that the oxygen available in the atmosphere of early Earth could accept been the limiting cistron for the emergence of multicellular life.[46] This hypothesis is based on the correlation betwixt the emergence of multicellular life and the increase of oxygen levels during this time. This would have taken place afterward the Peachy Oxidation Event but before the most recent rise in oxygen. Mills[47] concludes that the amount of oxygen nowadays during the Ediacaran is not necessary for complex life and therefore is unlikely to have been the driving factor for the origin of multicellularity.
Snowball Earth hypothesis [edit]
A snowball Earth is a geological event where the entire surface of the Earth is covered in snow and water ice. The nearly recent snowball Earth took place during the Cryogenian period and consisted of two global glaciation events known as the Sturtian and Marinoan glaciations. Xiao[48] suggests that between the menstruum of time known as the "Boring Billion" and the snowball Earth, simple life could have had time to introduce and evolve which could later atomic number 82 to the development of multicellularity. The snowball World hypothesis in regards to multicellularity proposes that the Cryogenian period in World history could have been the catalyst for the evolution of complex multicellular life. Brocks[49] suggests that the fourth dimension between the Sturtian Glacian and the more contempo Marinoan Glacian allowed for planktonic algae to dominate the seas making manner for rapid multifariousness of life for both plant and animal lineages. Before long after the Marinoan, circuitous life rapidly emerged and diversified in what is known as the Cambrian explosion.
Predation hypothesis [edit]
The predation hypothesis suggests that in social club to avoid being eaten by predators, simple single-celled organisms evolved multicellularity to make it harder to be consumed as prey. Herron et al.[fifty] performed laboratory evolution experiments on the single-celled dark-green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, using paramecium as a predator. They found that in the presence of this predator, C. reinhardtii does indeed evolve simple multicellular features.
Advantages [edit]
Multicellularity allows an organism to exceed the size limits normally imposed past diffusion: unmarried cells with increased size have a decreased surface-to-volume ratio and have difficulty absorbing sufficient nutrients and transporting them throughout the jail cell. Multicellular organisms thus take the competitive advantages of an increase in size without its limitations. They tin can have longer lifespans as they can continue living when private cells die. Multicellularity also permits increasing complexity by assuasive differentiation of prison cell types within 1 organism.
Whether these can be seen as advantages however is debatable. The vast majority of living organisms are single cellular, and fifty-fifty in terms of biomass, single cellular organisms are far more than successful than animals, though not plants.[51] Rather than seeing traits such equally longer lifespans and greater size equally an advantage, many biologists see these only as examples of diversity, with associated tradeoffs.
Run across as well [edit]
- Bacterial colony
- Embryogenesis
- Organogenesis
- Unicellular organism
References [edit]
- ^ Becker, Wayne M.; et al. (2008). The world of the cell. Pearson Benjamin Cummings. p. 480. ISBN978-0-321-55418-5.
- ^ Chimileski, Scott; Kolter, Roberto (2017). Life at the Edge of Sight: A Photographic Exploration of the Microbial World. Harvard University Printing. ISBN9780674975910.
- ^ a b c Lyons, Nicholas A.; Kolter, Roberto (April 2015). "On the evolution of bacterial multicellularity". Current Stance in Microbiology. 24: 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.12.007. ISSN 1879-0364. PMC4380822. PMID 25597443.
- ^ S. M. Miller (2010). "Volvox, Chlamydomonas, and the development of multicellularity". Nature Education. 3 (9): 65.
- ^ a b Brian Keith Hall; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Monroe W. Strickberger (2008). Strickberger's development: the integration of genes, organisms and populations (4th ed.). Hall/Hallgrímsson. p. 149. ISBN978-0-7637-0066-9.
- ^ Adl, Sina; et al. (October 2005). "The New Higher Level Nomenclature of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists". J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 52 (five): 399–451. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x. PMID 16248873. S2CID 8060916.
- ^ a b Grosberg, RK; Strathmann, RR (2007). "The development of multicellularity: A minor major transition?" (PDF). Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38: 621–654. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.114735.
- ^ Parfrey, L.W.; Lahr, D.J.G. (2013). "Multicellularity arose several times in the evolution of eukaryotes" (PDF). BioEssays. 35 (4): 339–347. doi:ten.1002/bies.201200143. PMID 23315654. S2CID 13872783.
- ^ http://public.wsu.edu/~lange-grand/Documnets/Teaching2011/Popper2011.pdf[ bare URL PDF ]
- ^ Niklas, KJ (2014). "The evolutionary-developmental origins of multicellularity". Am. J. Bot. 101 (1): vi–25. doi:10.3732/ajb.1300314. PMID 24363320.
- ^ Bonner, John Tyler (1998). "The Origins of Multicellularity" (PDF). Integrative Biology. 1 (one): 27–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6602(1998)one:one<27::AID-INBI4>3.0.CO;2-6. ISSN 1093-4391. Archived from the original on March 8, 2012.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - ^ Margulis, Fifty. & Chapman, M.J. (2009). Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on World ([4th ed.]. ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Printing/Elsevier. p. 116.
- ^ Seravin 50. N. (2001) The principle of counter-directional morphological development and its significance for constructing the megasystem of protists and other eukaryotes. Protistology ii: vi–14, [1].
- ^ Parfrey, L.W. & Lahr, D.J.M. (2013), p. 344.
- ^ Medina, M.; Collins, A. G.; Taylor, J. Westward.; Valentine, J. W.; Lipps, J. H.; Zettler, L. A. Amaral; Sogin, M. L. (2003). "Phylogeny of Opisthokonta and the development of multicellularity and complexity in Fungi and Metazoa". International Journal of Astrobiology. 2 (3): 203–211. Bibcode:2003IJAsB...ii..203M. doi:x.1017/s1473550403001551.
- ^ Seckbach, Joseph, Chapman, David J. [eds.]. (2010). Red algae in the genomic age. New York, NY, U.S.A.: Springer, p. 252, [2].
- ^ Cocquyt, E.; Verbruggen, H.; Leliaert, F.; De Clerck, O. (2010). "Evolution and Cytological Diversification of the Light-green Seaweeds (Ulvophyceae)". Mol. Biol. Evol. 27 (9): 2052–2061. doi:ten.1093/molbev/msq091. ISSN 0737-4038. PMID 20368268.
- ^ Richter, Daniel Joseph: The gene content of diverse choanoflagellates illuminates animal origins, 2013.
- ^ "Myxozoa". tolweb.org . Retrieved 14 Apr 2018.
- ^ Davies, P. C. W.; Lineweaver, C. H. (2011). "Cancer tumors as Metazoa 1.0: tapping genes of ancient ancestors". Physical Biology. 8 (1): 015001. Bibcode:2011PhBio...8a5001D. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015001. PMC3148211. PMID 21301065.
- ^ Richter, D. J. (2013), p. 11.
- ^ Gaspar, T.; Hagege, D.; Kevers, C.; Penel, C.; Crèvecoeur, M.; Engelmann, I.; Greppin, H.; Foidart, J. M. (1991). "When plant teratomas turn into cancers in the absenteeism of pathogens". Physiologia Plantarum. 83 (4): 696–701. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02489.x.
- ^ Lauckner, G. (1980). Diseases of protozoa. In: Diseases of Marine Animals. Kinne, O. (ed.). Vol. one, p. 84, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Britain.
- ^ Riker, A. J. (1958). "Constitute tumors: Introduction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.s. of America. 44 (4): 338–ix. Bibcode:1958PNAS...44..338R. doi:10.1073/pnas.44.4.338. PMC335422. PMID 16590201.
- ^ Doonan, J.; Chase, T. (1996). "Cell cycle. Why don't plants go cancer?". Nature. 380 (6574): 481–ii. doi:10.1038/380481a0. PMID 8606760. S2CID 4318184.
- ^ Ridley 1000 (2004) Evolution, 3rd edition. Blackwell Publishing, p. 295-297.
- ^ Niklas, K. J. (2014) The evolutionary-developmental origins of multicellularity.
- ^ Fairclough, Stephen R.; Dayel, Mark J.; Rex, Nicole (26 Oct 2010). "Multicellular development in a choanoflagellate". Current Biology. 20 (20): R875–R876. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.014. PMC2978077. PMID 20971426.
- ^ In a Single-Cell Predator, Clues to the Beast Kingdom's Birth
- ^ A H Knoll, 2003. Life on a Immature Planet. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-00978-iii (hardcover), ISBN 0-691-12029-three (paperback). An excellent book on the early on history of life, very accessible to the non-specialist; includes all-encompassing discussions of early signatures, fossilization, and organisation of life.
- ^ El Albani, Abderrazak; et al. (1 July 2010). "Big colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago". Nature. 466 (7302): 100–104. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..100A. doi:10.1038/nature09166. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 20596019. S2CID 4331375.
- ^ Chen, L.; Xiao, Due south.; Pang, K.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, X. (2014). "Cell differentiation and germ–soma separation in Ediacaran animal embryo-like fossils". Nature. 516 (7530): 238–241. Bibcode:2014Natur.516..238C. doi:10.1038/nature13766. PMID 25252979. S2CID 4448316.
- ^ Margulis, Lynn (1998). Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. New York: Basic Books. p. 160. ISBN978-0-465-07272-9.
- ^ Hickman CP, Hickman FM (viii July 1974). Integrated Principles of Zoology (5th ed.). Mosby. p. 112. ISBN978-0-8016-2184-0.
- ^ Wolpert, L.; Szathmáry, E. (2002). "Multicellularity: Evolution and the egg". Nature. 420 (6917): 745. Bibcode:2002Natur.420..745W. doi:10.1038/420745a. PMID 12490925. S2CID 4385008.
- ^ Kirk, D. L. (2005). "A twelve-pace plan for evolving multicellularity and a sectionalization of labor". BioEssays. 27 (3): 299–310. doi:ten.1002/bies.20197. PMID 15714559.
- ^ AlgaeBase. Volvox Linnaeus, 1758: 820.
- ^ Mikhailov K. 5., Konstantinova A. V., Nikitin M. A., Troshin P. V., Rusin L., Lyubetsky V., Panchin Y., Mylnikov A. P., Moroz L. 50., Kumar S. & Aleoshin V. 5. (2009). The origin of Metazoa: a transition from temporal to spatial cell differentiation. Bioessays, 31(7), 758–768, [3] Archived 2016-03-05 at the Wayback Auto.
- ^ Erwin, Douglas H. (9 November 2015). "Early metazoan life: divergence, environment and ecology". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 370 (20150036): 20150036. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0036. PMC4650120. PMID 26554036.
- ^ Zimmer, Carl (7 January 2016). "Genetic Flip Helped Organisms Go From One Cell to Many". New York Times . Retrieved seven January 2016.
- ^ a b Eugene Five. Koonin: Viruses and mobile elements equally drivers of evolutionary transitions. In: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 2016 Aug nineteen, doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0442
- ^ Rafi Letzter: An Ancient Virus May Be Responsible for Human Consciousness, in: Live Science, February 02, 2018
- ^ Mi S1, Lee X, Li 10, Veldman GM, Finnerty H, Racie 50, LaVallie E, Tang XY, Edouard P, Howes S, Keith JC Jr, McCoy JM.: Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in homo placental morphogenesis. In: Nature. 2000 Feb 17;403(6771):785-789. doi:10.1038/35001608, PMID 10693809
- ^ Jamin, M, H Raveh-Barak, B Podbilewicz, FA Rey et al. (2014) "Structural ground of eukaryotic jail cell-cell fusion" (Jail cell, Volume 157, Issue two, ten April 2014), Pages 407–419, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.020
- ^ Slezak, Michael (2016), "No Viruses? No skin or basic either" (New Scientist, No. 2958, 1 March 2014) p.16
- ^ Nursall, J. R. (April 1959). "Oxygen every bit a Prerequisite to the Origin of the Metazoa". Nature. 183 (4669): 1170–1172. Bibcode:1959Natur.183.1170N. doi:ten.1038/1831170b0. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4200584.
- ^ Mills, D. B.; Ward, L. Yard.; Jones, C.; Sweeten, B.; Along, M.; Treusch, A. H.; Canfield, D. E. (2014-02-18). "Oxygen requirements of the earliest animals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (xi): 4168–4172. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.4168M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400547111. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC3964089. PMID 24550467.
- ^ Lyons, Timothy W.; Droser, Mary L.; Lau, Kimberly V.; Porter, Susannah Chiliad.; Xiao, Shuhai; Tang, Qing (2018-09-28). "Later on the boring billion and before the freezing millions: evolutionary patterns and innovations in the Tonian Period". Emerging Topics in Life Sciences. 2 (2): 161–171. doi:10.1042/ETLS20170165. hdl:10919/86820. ISSN 2397-8554. PMID 32412616.
- ^ Brocks, Jochen J.; Jarrett, Amber J. Thou.; Sirantoine, Eva; Hallmann, Christian; Hoshino, Yosuke; Liyanage, Tharika (Baronial 2017). "The ascent of algae in Cryogenian oceans and the emergence of animals". Nature. 548 (7669): 578–581. Bibcode:2017Natur.548..578B. doi:ten.1038/nature23457. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 28813409. S2CID 205258987.
- ^ Herron, Matthew D.; Borin, Joshua M.; Boswell, Jacob C.; Walker, Jillian; Chen, I.-Chen Kimberly; Knox, Charles A.; Boyd, Margrethe; Rosenzweig, Frank; Ratcliff, William C. (2019-02-20). "De novo origins of multicellularity in response to predation". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 2328. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.2328H. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39558-eight. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC6382799. PMID 30787483.
- ^ Bar-On, Yinon M.; Phillips, Rob; Milo, Ron (2018-06-19). "The biomass distribution on Globe". PNAS. 115 (25): 6506–6511. doi:x.1073/pnas.1711842115. PMC6016768. PMID 29784790.
External links [edit]
- Tree of Life Eukaryotes
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicellular_organism
0 Response to "Man and Woman and Baby Clipart Single Celled Vs Multicellular Organism"
Enregistrer un commentaire